The Comedy of the Commons

I’m a huge fan of online collaboration, and I particularly love (and try to build) tools that encourage people to create common good while having fun. It’s the exact opposite of the tragedy of the commons: rather than squabbling over limited resources, and destroying them, people improve a shared resource, or create entirely new ones, while having a good time and benefiting themselves.

Many Eyes, from IBM’s Visual Communications Lab, lets you visualize word relationships in literature. It’s tremendous eye candy, and the visualizations are in essence collaborations between the site’s developers (Fernanda and Martin, who I saw give a great talk at this year’s Foo Camp*) and its users, who contribute data for the visualizations.

Self-sacrifice is a beautiful thing, but not the most effective motivator; for getting things done, there’s nothing like aligning the interests of individuals and groups. It’s idealism without the masochism, something Wordie aspires to. Many Eyes is fun, beautiful, and a great example of this mechanism in action.

* Pathetic name dropper: guilty.

Glossaralia

I’ve been coming across lots of online glossaries lately; here are some of the ones I’ve particularly enjoyed (possibly my fav: the cheese glossary. though maybe I’m just hungry). If you’re creating a Wordie list on a specific topic (scissors and shears, anyone?), these are a goldmine.

Many of these were discovered through the web site of Frank Dietz, a man who clearly loves glossaries. Thanks Frank!

I’ll be updating this list as more gems crop up. If there’s a glossary you’d like to see included, let me know in the comments.

Acroynms, military
Advertising (University of Texas at Austin)
Agriculture (New Mexico State University)
Art (ArtLex)
Aviation (AeroFiles)
Beer (Chowbaby)
Beer (Foster’s Group)
Building Terms (contractorslicense.com)
Business (Foley Hoag)
Business Dictionary (BusinessDictionary.com)
Business (Washington Post)
Cars (AutoSpeak)
Catholic Terms
Catholic Terms (US Conference of Catholic Bishops)
Cheese Terms (Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board)
Cigars (Chowbaby)
Coffee (Chowbaby)
Color (SAP Design Guild)
Computer & Internet (Sharpened.net)
Food (Chowbaby)
Footwear (ShoeGuide.org)
Furniture (TheFurniture.com)
Glossaries (glossarist.com)
Glossaries (Frank Dietz)
Hospital Healthcare (Montevideo Hospital)
Industrial Nuts (Industrial Nut Corp.)
Investing and Finance (investorwords.com)
Islamic Law (Mutma’inaa)
Islamic Terms (University of Southern California)
Jewish Terms (JewishEncyclopedia.com)
Lighting (Lithonia Lighting)
Lighting Design (Schorsch)
Law (NOLO)
Linguistics (SIL)
Nautical Terms (Answers.com)
Online News Terms (USC Annenberg Online Journalism Review)
Pest Management (University of California)
Philosophy (Stanford)
Plastics (American Chemistry Council)
Poetic Terms (University of Toronto)
Publishing (Rainwater Press)
Printmaking Terms (University of Kansas Spencer Museum of Art)
Radio terms (University of Delaware)
Railroad Terms (San Diego Railroad Museum)
Real Estate (Gibbons Realty)
Roofing Terms (pmel.org)
Sailing (SailingLinks)
Scissors and Shears (Claussco)
Sex (sex-lexis.com)
Sikh Terms (Sandeep Singh Brar)
Solar Heating (Go Solar)
Spirits, as in liquor, not ghosts (Chowbaby)
Subtitler’s and Translator’s Tools (transedit.se)
Sushi (Chowbaby)
Tea (Chowbaby)
Telecommunications (CHR Solutions)
Telecommunications (National Telecommunications and Information Administration)
Theater (CalPoly)
TV Advertising (Audience Analytics)
Weather Terms (weather.com)
Wine (Chowbaby)
Wine (Foster’s Group)

QToro! Toro! Toro!

My pal and fellow LibraryThing alum, Altay, has launched a fantastic new site, QToro. That’s right, the world first and best social network for lawnmower afficionados.

Actually it’s a new trivia site, with all questions contributed by members. It’s beautifully designed and executed, and horribly, amazingly addictive. Already Qtoro is without a doubt the best trivia site on the Interwebs, and it’s getting better by the day as people fill it with a plethora of questions.

It’s hard to say what’s more fun, writing questions or playing the game. Please check it out and decide for yourself–but only if you have at least an hour to kill.

Listphile

My pal Steve just launched Listphile.com, a site for making collaborative lists of all kinds. It’s beautiful, super easy to use, and worth checking out. It just launched, but already has an enjoyable assortment of user-contributed lists spanning the gamut from lighthearted fun (The Dude Abides, Yoda Quotes with Video) to more serious collective information gathering (Open Surf Atlas). Stop by and vote for Wordie on my list of Language-related sites.

Collaborative Fiction

One of my favorite childhood games was the story-go-round. I first discovered it on a Boy Scout campout, as my troop gathered around the fire to toast marshmallows. Our scoutmaster would begin telling a story, but stop after a few sentences of exposition and prompt the next kid in line to continue from where he had left off. And so we’d elaborate, one by one, each improvising the next crazy direction for our story to go, until it was the scoutmaster’s turn again, and he would attempt to tie up all the lose ends and conclude the tale.

I realized two things: First, Boy Scouts aren’t actually very good storytellers, and eventually every plot ended up involving aliens and X-Men blowing everything up. Second, most kids don’t really even like storytelling. Once the novelty of the game wore off, nobody wanted to play anymore. Except me. I’m a wordie kind of guy. It’s in my blood.

I’ll assume it’s in your blood too, or you wouldn’t be reading Errata. If that’s the case, wouldn’t it be great if we could use the internet to play a grown-up version of the story-go-round, where contributors actually know how to write and are passionate about doing so? Sounds like a heck of a time waster, if nothing else. Good news: we can.

I’d like to say I came up with idea, but alas. It’s a new site I recently discovered, where anyone can write short stories called “ficlets.” Very very short stories, actually. There’s a 1,024 character limit for each one. What’s fun is the ability to write a sequel or prequel to any ficlet on the site, and others can do the same with yours. Even if you don’t feel like writing, it’s pretty cool to read others’ stories from beginning to end and see the unique ideas and writing styles presented by each author.

Enough blabbing, go check out Ficlets for yourself! And if you’re interested in collaborating with me, here’s a direct link to the stories I’ve written.

(This was originally posted on the old errata by uselessness)