Announcing Wordnik’s 2010 Developer Challenge

Today Wordnik is announcing our 2010 Wordnik API Developers Challenge, a contest to reward the best and most interesting uses of our API. We’re giving $5,000 and mad props to the best entries in these categories:

Games
There are 8 million crappy hangman and scrabble-esque games on the Interwebs. Can you use Wordnik data as a foundation to build something completely different, something more than a réchauffé of the same tired ideas? Maybe a social or location-based or other bandwagonesque mashup? Or if you’re a traditionalist, can you build a better implementation of a well-loved classic? APIs from Facebook, Twitter, foursquare, NYTimes.com and Gowalla are great candidates for game-like integrations.

Books
Rich language data can make the act of reading even more intensely pleasurable than it already is. Can you build tools that provide depth and context to the words in books, magazines, and newspapers? Can you build interfaces that take advantage of an always-on connection to do new and interesting things with language, without distracting readers from a deep-dive into long-form media?

Business
Can you take our data and make it available to writers, marketers, and professionals inside their favorite tools, like Google Apps and Microsoft Office? That’d be cool.

These categories are more guides than strict rules–come up with something completely different, and you can still be rewarded and recognized.

Submissions to Wordnik’s 2010 Developers Challenge will be accepted starting May 3rd, up through May 21st For more information and to sign up for email updates, please see the Developers Challenge web page., and if you have any questions, please direct them to apiteam@wordnik.com. Happy coding!

Many thanks to st3f4n for the photo / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Join the Wordnik API Google Group

Photo from The Library of Virginia collection on Flickr.

If you’re developing applications with the Wordnik API, are interested in doing so, or just want to eavesdrop on people who are using it, please join our new Wordnik API Google Group. It’s open to anyone and will be regularly monitored by the API developers. Use it to ask questions, discuss projects, find collaborators, and promote your work.

Other API resources worth mentioning (and which might come in handy for our soon-to-be-announced developer challenge) are the Wordnik github account (where you can find API sample code in Ruby, PHP, Java, and Javascript), and the Wordnik API twitter feed.

The Audio Cyclopedia

vacuum tube schematicI used to work at the Woods Hole Institute of Oceanography, in a basement office within sight of where Alvin was built. The basement held another, less-heralded marvel: the free table. Whenever a lab was overhauled or a grad student moved on, they’d cull their detritus and dump it on the free table. Part of the pinko ethos that infects academia, no doubt, but a wonderful thing.

Usual fare ran toward outdated WordPerfect manuals, but you would sometimes find a collection of neatly piled Pyrex labware with a note saying “slightly contaminated.” Or a broken oscilloscope. Or five cartons of Hollerith cards. Pretty great to a technostalgic pack rat.

I especially loved finding specialized reference books. They’re usually de facto dictionaries, but the words are in situ, being put to good use as they’re being defined. One of my favorite free table gimmes was just such a book: The Audio Cyclopedia*, by Howard M. Tremaine. Probably bought in the seventies by someone working on sonar or recording whale songs, it’s a 1,700 page compendium of recording technology, in excruciating detail and with a weird Jeopardy! pose-everything-as-a-question prose style.

It is an absolutely tremendous source of of technicalese and audio industry terms of art, so yesterday I finally started a list I’ve been meaning to get to for a long time: Audio Argot, inspired by the Audio Cyclopedia. Please contribute, it’s an open list. Anything audio related fits the bill, I think—words needn’t come specifically from the Cyclopedia, but for those that do I’ll add a citation. Here’s the list.

* It seems to still be in demand. My scavenged copy is the 2nd edition, first published in 1969; the first edition was published in 1959 and it is not cheap.

I’ve got no option but to sell you all for scientific experiments.

I’ve got an amazing announcement: Wordie is going to become part of Wordnik.com, as am I. Wordnik is built by and for word freaks and is teh alsome; it’s hard to imagine a better partner for Wordie. I’m ecstatic about this, and I’m sure we’ll fit right in*.

For the time being what this means to you, the social word lover, is… nothing. Both sites will chug along while we plan their integration. Then in the not-too-distant future Wordnik will receive a facelift, and either as part of that or immediately subsequent to it Wordie will be formally incorporated into Wordnik.

Making lists, adding words to lists, and commenting on lists and words will remain core features and free, from now until the sun expands into a red giant, extinguishing all earthly life that hasn’t escaped the bounds of the solar system. Your Wordie identity will travel with you into Wordnik, as will your lists, your words, and your comments**. We will go to extreme lengths to ensure that Wordnik is infused with all that is good about Wordie.

Integration will be greatly eased by the fact that the two sites are eerily well-aligned: Wordie has few real lexicographic features (hi Weirdnet!) and will greatly benefit from the corpus humongous and sprawling lexicographical fantasia that is Wordnik. And Wordnik’s social features are, at the moment, few.

Hey kids, let’s build a dictionary!

The most exciting aspect of this is that we will now get a voice in building the mother and father of all dictionaries. Wordnik already has a tremendous amount of data, but it’s still at the beginning stages of an audacious project: to catalog all the English words that ever were and ever will be, to watch and listen to the language as it is created and evolves, and to talk about it while that happens. Because we’re joining forces early in the process of figuring out what a lexicographically rich, highly social dictionary-of-the-future can be, it gives those of us who care the opportunity to have our voices heard. You can start talking about what you’d like to see Wordnik become and how Wordie should fit into it in the comments below, or anywhere on Wordie (like Wordnik, for instance). And of course you can always email me.

Thank you.

I’m weak in the knees that I’ll now get to spend all day doing what I’ve previously had to relegate to nights and weekends, and I want to thank my new best friends at Wordnik for inviting me to the party. But most of all I’d like to thank all the Wordie regulars for turning Wordie from a small joke into a place I love, an avocation, and now something bigger. It’s amazing: I launched a very crude container and you guys filled it not just with words and lists, but with wit and erudition and good cheer. I am eternally, profoundly grateful.

You can email your thoughts, concerns, and suggestions to john@wordnik.com (john@wordie.org will always work too). I think this is going to be fun.

* Here’s Erin’s post on Wordnik.
** We’re working on a feature that lets you bring them with you into the afterlife.

Wordnik, Varnish

I just added a Wordnik chiclet to the word pages. The new link has pole position, on the far left of the row of links beneath each word.

I love Wordnik’s kitchen sink approach—they have tremendous data, all of which they dump in your lap—and that they include real-time search from Twitter, which will hopefully expand to include FriendFeed and other real-time services. They* are cataloging the language as it’s being used and created, which is awesome. Each of Wordnik’s 1.7 million words has a summary page which links to detail pages for etymologies, examples, tags, and more. It’s not much to look at yet, design-wise, but the content is fabulous. Slap on a coat of varnish and it’ll be perfect.

Speaking of varnish, last night I added a new caching mechanism to Wordie, called… Varnish. Wordie is serving pages considerably faster now, and I think this will also fix an occasional issue that made the homepage molasses-slow when it was being updated during high traffic periods. The changes may have broken some stuff in the margins (like Errata, for a while—thanks to telofy for alerting me to that), so let me know if Wordie is more erratic than usual.

* “They” are celebrity lexicographers Erin McKean and Grant Barrett, on the editorial side. Wordnik is pedigreed 🙂

Birdie Num Num

Yesterday chandas tweeted one of the more technically awkward web pages I’ve seen in a while, but the content is great. It appears to be a rather large dictionary of bird names, saved as a single html page from a Microsoft Word file. It’s all text with no images or links, there’s no obvious indication of who wrote or compiled it (it’s hosted on the Weisblum Lab Antibiotics Webpage, where it’s linked to as “Arthur Smith’s Bird Dictionary”), and it weighs in at a browser-crashing 12 MB.

Once you get past that it’s chockablock with good stuff—bird names and their synonyms starting with Aasvogel (“the name for the larger vultures by the Dutch colonists in Africa”) and ending with Zeldonia, the generic name for the Wrenthrush. The whole thing is a good potential source for some of the better bird lists on Wordie.

UPDATE: This one must be making the rounds. Language Hat blogged it a few days ago.