<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A random walk through Wordnik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordnik.com/a-random-walk-through-wordnik/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordnik.com/a-random-walk-through-wordnik</link>
	<description>Connecting people with meaning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMM</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordnik.com/a-random-walk-through-wordnik/comment-page-1#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>MMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=315#comment-861</guid>
		<description>One of the great things about the grand wordnik corpus is that I can search for rare and even outlandish forms of words I like, with a reasonable chance of finding a stray usage case here and there.

When I&#039;m in the mood for word games, I like to browse the latest updates along the bottom of each page - because who doesn&#039;t like feeling they&#039;re not alone in the world? - and think up interesting derivative forms.  Then I look for similar words that might accept the same derivative. (cravenly... cravenlily?  no.  but friendlily, courtlily?  yah.  testosterous?  no. [but such a sussurous unword!]  testosteronic?  no worries.  curmudgeoning?  perhaps.  escutcheoning?  not on wordnik, but so satisfying... yes, there it is...  example commented in.)

Then there is list surfing, much more passive but equally rewarding.  If an amazing word is on a list that is well titled, I browse the list for other words like it... mainly ones that are themselves on more than one list (so I can repeat the process).  One can build up quite a treasure of obliquely and inspiringly related words that way, by simply following one&#039;s whims.  I sometimes make my own lists in the process, to help harmonize aha!s into something concise and interesting to others.

Between these two, I usually come away from a visit word-sated, no matter how wired or tired I was to start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the great things about the grand wordnik corpus is that I can search for rare and even outlandish forms of words I like, with a reasonable chance of finding a stray usage case here and there.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;m in the mood for word games, I like to browse the latest updates along the bottom of each page &#8211; because who doesn&#8217;t like feeling they&#8217;re not alone in the world? &#8211; and think up interesting derivative forms.  Then I look for similar words that might accept the same derivative. (cravenly&#8230; cravenlily?  no.  but friendlily, courtlily?  yah.  testosterous?  no. [but such a sussurous unword!]  testosteronic?  no worries.  curmudgeoning?  perhaps.  escutcheoning?  not on wordnik, but so satisfying&#8230; yes, there it is&#8230;  example commented in.)</p>
<p>Then there is list surfing, much more passive but equally rewarding.  If an amazing word is on a list that is well titled, I browse the list for other words like it&#8230; mainly ones that are themselves on more than one list (so I can repeat the process).  One can build up quite a treasure of obliquely and inspiringly related words that way, by simply following one&#8217;s whims.  I sometimes make my own lists in the process, to help harmonize aha!s into something concise and interesting to others.</p>
<p>Between these two, I usually come away from a visit word-sated, no matter how wired or tired I was to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

