Comments on: 12 Months with MongoDB http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb Connecting people with meaning. Wed, 09 May 2012 19:58:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Angela Tung http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-2330 Angela Tung Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:59:06 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-2330 Yes, here it is: https://www.facebook.com/wordnik.fans Yes, here it is: https://www.facebook.com/wordnik.fans

]]> By: Descargar http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-2328 Descargar Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:43:48 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-2328 Hey, do you have a facebook fanpage? Hey, do you have a facebook fanpage?

]]> By: WP7 Resolution http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-2258 WP7 Resolution Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:03:27 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-2258 I am really intrigued by mono DB now. I am really intrigued by mono DB now.

]]> By: vermoid http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-2051 vermoid Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:56:59 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-2051 Great numbers, thanks for publishing it. I had one question about data distribution. How were you sharding the data? Great numbers, thanks for publishing it.
I had one question about data distribution.
How were you sharding the data?

]]> By: neo http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-1836 neo Fri, 12 Nov 2010 06:49:46 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-1836 i have the same one here did it mean thread i have the same one here did it mean thread

]]> By: tonytam http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-1771 tonytam Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:06:34 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-1771 @DC, no I meant separate VM instances, not threads. Since we use the driver in the recommended manner (singleton), we wanted to benchmark the throughput without concerns of blocking in the driver. I'll repost after I get a chance to rerun the benchmark with a multi-threaded client (same VM). @DC, no I meant separate VM instances, not threads. Since we use the driver in the recommended manner (singleton), we wanted to benchmark the throughput without concerns of blocking in the driver. I’ll repost after I get a chance to rerun the benchmark with a multi-threaded client (same VM).

]]> By: tonytam http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-1770 tonytam Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:04:18 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-1770 @tommy, documents are pretty similar to what you see over our public api, with the exception of fields used for internal use. Some of the doucments (dictionary model http://github.com/wordnik/api-examples/blob/master/docs/dictionary.xsd) has 6 levels of hierarchy (if I remember correctly). Our web front end uses the same REST api as the public API, so yes, we consume JSON in the templating layer. The mapping between JSON/XML in mongo and over the REST front end is done a couple different ways, via proprietary ODM. In a couple cases we work against the DBObject structure sent by the java driver, in others we rely on Jackson (http://jackson.codehaus.org/) to convert MongoDB JSON into java objects. We use two different mappers to give different behavior between the object annotations, which works out really well. @tommy, documents are pretty similar to what you see over our public api, with the exception of fields used for internal use. Some of the doucments (dictionary model http://github.com/wordnik/api-examples/blob/master/docs/dictionary.xsd) has 6 levels of hierarchy (if I remember correctly).

Our web front end uses the same REST api as the public API, so yes, we consume JSON in the templating layer. The mapping between JSON/XML in mongo and over the REST front end is done a couple different ways, via proprietary ODM. In a couple cases we work against the DBObject structure sent by the java driver, in others we rely on Jackson (http://jackson.codehaus.org/) to convert MongoDB JSON into java objects. We use two different mappers to give different behavior between the object annotations, which works out really well.

]]> By: DC http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-1763 DC Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:52:12 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-1763 when you said java client, did you mean thread? when you said java client, did you mean thread?

]]> By: tommy http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-1761 tommy Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:46:19 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-1761 Can you comment about your data modeling? How many levels of embedded documents do you use? On average, how large is a document in a collection? Do you have to deal with de/serializing between your API and your web frontend? Can you comment about your data modeling?

How many levels of embedded documents do you use?

On average, how large is a document in a collection?

Do you have to deal with de/serializing between your API and your web frontend?

]]> By: tonytam http://blog.wordnik.com/12-months-with-mongodb/comment-page-1#comment-1756 tonytam Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:24:08 +0000 http://blog.wordnik.com/?p=548#comment-1756 @Kamil, we store audio files of 50-250kb. Got roughly 100k of them right now. We haven't stressed that part of the system but we are gearing up for serving audio out to our API users, which will increase the traffic to the files substantially @Kamil, we store audio files of 50-250kb. Got roughly 100k of them right now. We haven’t stressed that part of the system but we are gearing up for serving audio out to our API users, which will increase the traffic to the files substantially

]]>